Nao Hibino vs Petra Hule Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Hibino vs P. Hule

Nao Hibino
JPN
w
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
26
1.63m
Height
-
174
C. Rank
691
56
Best Rank
287
3
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.6M
Career Money
$0
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-

Petra Hule
AUS
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
30
Age
26
1.63m
Height
-
174
C. Rank
691
56
Best Rank
287
3
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$1.6M
Career Money
$0
Right-handed (two-handed backhand)
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Hibino 1 - 0 Hule
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nao Hibino winning 2 and Petra Hule winning 0. The last match between Nao Hibino and Petra Hule was at the W100 Incheon, 23-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hibino | 1 |
| Hule | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W100 Incheon(09-23-25)
Nao Hibino
6
6
Petra Hule
3
0
N. Hibino vs P. Hule H2H Profile
N. Hibino vs P. Hule Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nao Hibino has won 39.24% of points on their second serve, while Petra Hule has won 35.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nao Hibino, in recent form, has won 48.81% of their opponent's second serve points, while Petra Hule has won 50.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.15% and 33.40% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nao Hibino has saved 48.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Petra Hule has saved 45.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nao Hibino has won 50.00% of matches played (W/L 26/26), with Petra Hule winning 24.14% (W/L 7/22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nao Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 292/223), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 55/66). Petra Hule has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 19/13), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
- Player level: In the last year, Nao Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/10), where as Petra Hule has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25.00% of matches (W/L 7/21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nao Hibino winning 1 times and Petra Hule being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nao Hibino winning 2 and Petra Hule winning 0.
- The last match between Nao Hibino and Petra Hule was at the W100 Incheon, 23-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:6:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nao Hibino has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.83 while Petra Hule has played against players with an average rank of 360.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nao Hibino has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Petra Hule has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nao Hibino has converted 45.00% of breakpoint opportunities, and Petra Hule has converted 41.10% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nao Hibino vs Petra Hule Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Hibino vs P. Hule H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:6:30 | Average Match Time | 1:6:30 |
| 69% (33/48) | 1st Serve % | 64% (27/42) |
| 76% (25/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 48% (13/27) |
| 73% (11/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (6/15) |
| 67% (4/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
| 55% (23/42) | Return Points Win % | 25% (12/48) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Hibino 46%, Hule 37%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Hibino 56%, Hule 53%.
Break Points Saved %: Hibino 54%, Hule 49%.
N. Hibino Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 3-6 7-5 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
P. Hule Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 4-3 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | ||

N. Hibino vs P. Hule Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.48% (407/340) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.96% (106/102) |
| 53.01% (908/805) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.29% (239/227) |
| 51.53% (8064/7585) | Games Win/Loss | 50.87% (2153/2079) |
| 56.70% (292/223) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.33% (76/75) |
| 45.45% (55/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.38% (19/13) |
| 57.78% (26/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.67% (5/7) |
| 51.52% (34/32) | Grass Win/Loss | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 1023 | Aces Total | 212 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.38 |
| 1612 | Total Double Faults | 776 |
| 1:12:54 | Average Match Time | 1:24:49 |
| 485.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 428.29 |
| 65% (25797/39512) | 1st Serve % | 69% (8386/12110) |
| 61% (15626/25797) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (4988/8386) |
| 46% (6358/13712) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (1601/3724) |
| 48% (2294/4825) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (735/1478) |
| 45% (17789/39756) | Return Points Win % | 46% (5450/11827) |
| 47.56% (39/43) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 42.42% (28/38) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 48.82% (103/108) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59.48% (204/139) | Challenger W/L | 52.17% (96/88) |
| 82.76% (24/5) | Futures W/L | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 54% (400/735) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (104/204) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 57% (87/152) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (18/39) |
| 56% (125/223) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (23/50) |
| 86% (385/331) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (104/93) |
| 14% (385/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (104/11) |
| 20% (362/73) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (104/13) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 28 Nov, 06:00 PM
PredictionThu, 27 Nov, 11:30 PM
PredictionThu, 27 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionThu, 27 Nov, 08:50 AM
PredictionThu, 27 Nov, 08:03 AM
PredictionThu, 27 Nov, 10:30 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

26 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Mayar Sherif vs Eva Vedder Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

26 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Elena Malygina Prediction – WTA W75 Trnava – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →James Duckworth vs Karan Singh Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 26th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Luisina Giovannini vs Leolia Jeanjean Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets

25 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oleksandra Oliynykova vs Sada Nahimana Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 25th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
14:00
H2H 0-1
11:00
H2H 0-0
13:00
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
14:00
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Athens Challenger
Greece
Bogota Challenger
Colombia
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Temuco Challenger
Chile
M15 La Paz
Bolivia
M15 Madrid
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Ribeirao Preto
Brazil
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Hradec Kralove
Czech Republic
M25 Luanda
Angola